strongspot.blogg.se

1. #SIGMA FP IMAGE STABILIZATION SERIAL#
2. #SIGMA FP IMAGE STABILIZATION UPDATE#
3. #SIGMA FP IMAGE STABILIZATION MANUAL#
4. #SIGMA FP IMAGE STABILIZATION TV#

#SIGMA FP IMAGE STABILIZATION UPDATE#

#SIGMA FP IMAGE STABILIZATION SERIAL#

Please select the applicable product from the following page, go to the download page, click “Sony E-mount(applicable Serial No.)” and follow the update procedure. Improved tracking performance when the camera’s focus mode is set to AF-C.

You could also add motion blur in post, but this only really works well if there is just a single plane of motion. The other option is shooting at a super high frame rate to minimize any MB, and use the EIS/gopro method.

It's sometimes possible to remove motion blur from footage but it's extremely difficult, and even if it's possible you'll need to teach the computer to disambiguate jitter motion blur from subject movement motion blur, which is kind of like trying to take the egg out of a baked cake. If you want cinematic 180 deg shutter motion blur you're also going to get motion blur from your jitter. The reason I'd be reluctant to try this is that EIS has a lot of fundamental limitations when it comes to large sensor cameras running at normal frame rates. One option would just be to mount a gopro to the FP, line up the footage of the gopro to the FP and apply the gyro stabilization to the FP footage - I assume any stand alone gyro would be larger/more expensive than a gopro. That could be a good idea for some situations. Given all that, would the Bolex-like setup be a viable way of getting footage without a lot of jitter? Or is a much larger rig or a gimbal necessary? My most used focal lengths will be between 28 - 85mm, with probably 80% of the work happening on the 50.

My only concern is about how much camera shake such a small setup would have given it doesn't have much mass to "dampen" the jitter. The setups I've seen on here that seem the most interesting to me are the Bolex style rigs with the pistol grip combined with the Sigma OVF loupe since both the grip and OVF attachment could fit in a small bag and I could get set up in a few minutes. The ideal amount of movement for me is similar to handheld cinema rigs, e.g. I'm not interested in using the built in electronic stabilization (I'd rather do that in post if I really have to) and IBIS isn't something I'm interested in (IBIS can make footage a nightmare for VFX work even if it looks fine to the naked eye). I generally prefer the hand held look but at the same time I don't like excessive micro jitter, especially when it creates unnecessary motion blur on otherwise sharp footage.

#SIGMA FP IMAGE STABILIZATION MANUAL#

I'd be using manual glass more or less full time, probably M mount wide angle lenses for photography (using it something like a FF Ricoh GR) and my Contax Zeiss lenses for filming.

#SIGMA FP IMAGE STABILIZATION TV#

My day job is in VFX for movies and TV and I wouldn't mind having the option of a small hybrid that could approximate the kind of footage I usually deal with at work (Reds, Alexas, etc.) so I can work on my own projects as well as for some RnD. I've been considering the FP as a hybrid camera, mostly for walkaround photography but some occasional high quality video.